As Yvonne has pointed out, perspective's a funny thing. I had the same reaction on my first "Queensboro Loop" after time off as she just had to her first "Tri-Borough Run" (which, is basically the same course). That reaction was, "Dear Lord, this is a long way! What ever possessed me to think marathoning was a good idea? And how'd I ever run this twice a week last fall???" Relativity is a funny thing.
Today I had another experience with perspective. Since I've re-taken to running after my months-long (and somewhat anticlimactic) trial build-up I've noticed that my pace has been quite a bit faster than last fall at the same effort. I've assumed that would change, that I'd soon be back to running 7:40-8:00 like last fall once the mileage got back up. Today, I assumed, would be that day. I'd run just under 2 hours on Saturday followed by 10k at a decent clip on Sunday. My legs this morning felt sluggish, I felt dehydrated, I still haven't acclimated to morning running, and, to top it off, I've developed a mild shin-splint in my left leg. If there was ever a day where running was a struggle, it was this morning and I knew that today was the day to get back to "normal" paces. I was therefore somewhat (or rather, completely) surprised when I got home to learn that the pace had been 7:36/mile for the 8.6 miles. I guess it's all a matter of perspective because it certainly didn't seem that fast. Of course, we'll have to see if this effort continues to produce 7:10-7:30 miles as I continue to drive up the mileage, but for the moment I'd like to delude myself into thinking I'm fit.
I've decided to dump Edith Wharton. It's just not working out for me. Really, it's not her. It's me. I just don't feel the connection. There's no spark; no chemistry. And there's another woman in my life. She's the subject of both song and poem. I'm now reading Alone of All Her Sex: The Myth and the Cult of the Virgin Mary, from whence comes this lovely Christmas poem --
Natus est de virgine
Sol de stella;
Sol occasum nesciens
Stella semper rutilans,
Semper clara.
Sicut sidus radium,
Profert virgo filium,
Pari forma.
Neque sidus radio,
Neque mater filio
Fit corrupta.
Week (of 3/19) in Review
Monday | Rest | -- | -- |
Tuesday | 5.25 miles | 39:30 | 7:31/mile |
Wednesday | 4.15 miles | 29:47 | 7:11/mile |
Thursday | Sick Day | -- | -- |
Friday | Rest | -- | -- |
Saturday | 14.5 Miles | 1:50:00 | 7:34/mile |
Sunday | 6.25 miles | 45:08 | 7:13/mile |
Total | 30.2 Miles | -- | -- |
2 comments:
You wouldn't be the first runner who notices an improvement in his or her running after an enforced absence. Let's hope it will continue.
I haven't really been focusing on pace. I have no goals or races I'm aiming for at the moment. Just running fast when I feel like it, slow when I don't. (And most of the time I prefer to go faster.) So, these aren't targets. I'm just reporting these paces because I find the numbers interesting and I wonder what happens next.
But, with that said, McMillan tells me 7:27-7:57. So, I'm slightly faster, but I don't think unreasonably so.
Post a Comment